WORLD GPU CENTERCOMPUTE · CONTEXT · CLARITY
Home / INFERENCE / ANALYSIS

INFERENCE / ANALYSIS

One million tokens is not one universal unit of work.

Why prompt length, output quality, latency and acceptance belong beside a cost figure.

Original analysis · 8 November 2026

Define what the token count contains

Input processing and output generation have different compute behaviour. Long contexts, cache reuse, speculative decoding and batching can change the serving profile. A single output-tokens-per-second number cannot represent every prompt distribution or concurrency level. State whether a price or benchmark covers input, output or both.

Add a service constraint

A fast batch throughput result may be inappropriate for an interactive assistant. Record time to first token, inter-token delay, concurrency and error rate. Quality must also meet the task requirement. A cheap output that fails evaluation is not equivalent to an accepted answer, and retries consume resources even when a customer never sees them.

Use the calculator as a scenario

Our Inference Economics tool multiplies user-entered throughput by provisioned time, serving load and an accepted-output share. It divides the supplied period cost by the resulting accepted output tokens. It does not simulate prefill, batching, queueing or a serving engine. Enter measured throughput for the intended mix; do not substitute a hardware peak.

Close the loop with evaluation

MLCommons provides defined benchmark scenarios; those conditions matter when reading results. CoreWeave’s Forge announcement illustrates the broader industry move toward connected evaluation and iteration. For a procurement decision, define a representative evaluation set, measure the actual workload and preserve both the quality and infrastructure configuration alongside the cost.

Official references: M1, C2. Checked 8 November 2026. Company descriptions remain attributed; announced plans retain their conditions.

Turn the GPU question
into a clearer brief.

Open the Decision Lab